Sometimes I start by skimming through to see how much might be relevant. Include as much detail as you need to fully understand the work.
Additionally, I think about what would happen in our model if we used the same methods as they did and what we could learn from that. Ensure that the authors have included relevant and sufficient numbers of controls. Understanding research paper you agree with them?
I often find that the supplementary figures actually offer the most curious and interesting results, especially if the results relate to parts of the field that the authors did not reference or if they are unclear or unhelpful to their interpretation of the overall story. Understanding research paper want Understanding research paper help people become more scientifically literate, so I wrote this guide for how a layperson can approach reading and understanding a Understanding research paper research paper.
Sometimes I get angry about the authors not writing clearly enough, omitting essential points and dwelling on superfluous nonsense.
Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you. But when you get proof, accept proof. As I go deeper into the argument framing, figures, and discussion, I also think about which pieces are exciting and new, which ones are biologically or logically relevant, and which ones are most supported by the literature.
Check out Web of Science for a more complete index of science journals. Obviously everyone has a different answer to that question. Rural out-migration may mitigate this difference.
There may be multiple questions, or just one. If there is a reference after a statement that I find particularly interesting or controversial, I also look it up. I also have thrown up my hands in frustration and tossed the offending papers away, never to read them again.
Read the results section. Expecting to digest and understand everything in it in one afternoon is a far-fetched idea. What, according to the authors, needs to be done next? Reading a scientific paper is a completely different process from reading an article about science in a blog or newspaper.
Do you see any that the authors missed? Simultaneously, some papers are written terribly and are not worth the effort.
You also need to know your own limits: I like to print out the paper and highlight the most relevant information, so on a quick rescan I can be reminded of the major points. Remember that they are only a snapshot of the research at the time they are published.
If the paper is vital to my research—and if it is theoretical—I would reinvent the paper. Someone else has surely written about the concepts more clearly so that I can keep my confusion focused on understanding substance rather than poor grammar.
I usually do not try to understand all the details in all the sections the first time I read a paper. Who are the acknowledged or self-proclaimed experts in this particular field?
If non-understandable parts appear important for my research, I try to ask colleagues or even contact the lead author directly. What exactly are the authors trying to answer with their research? Some people stretch their claims more than others, and that can be a red flag for me.
You might have tried to read scientific papers before and been frustrated by the dense, stilted writing and the unfamiliar jargon. For certain types of studies, a lack of confidence intervals is a major red flag.
Sometimes I am curious to see who in the field has—or more likely has not—been referenced, to see whether the authors are choosing to ignore certain aspects of the research.
Do you see any that the authors missed? But to form a truly educated opinion on a scientific subject, you need to become familiar with current research in that field.
I remember feeling this Understanding research paper Scientific words have extremely precise meanings. What are the limitations of that work? The abstract is that dense first paragraph at the very beginning of a paper. Pay careful attention to them!My first series of articles that appeared on the Science and Sensibility blog.
This series focused on finding, reading, and understanding research. Introduction to the Series. The methods section describes actions to be taken to investigate a research problem and the rationale for the application of specific procedures or techniques used to identify, select, process, and analyze information applied to understanding the problem, thereby, allowing the reader to critically.
This report outlines the Scottish Government's understanding of the Scottish rural economy and presents economic and social data.
I want to help people become more scientifically literate, so I wrote this guide for how a layperson can approach reading and understanding a scientific research paper. How to Read a Research Paper (Lewy Body Dementia Association) - PDF; Understanding Medical Words: A Tutorial from the National Library of Medicine (National Library of Medicine) Find health information in languages other than English on Understanding Medical Research.
Reading and understanding research papers is a skill that every single doctor and scientist has had to learn during graduate school. How to Read and Understand a Scientific Paper: A Step-by.Download